PQI:
Perkins Institute
Case
Study: Applying the 5-Step Model
APPLYING
THE PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
A MnSCU
CASE STUDY
Work Session Break-Out 2
Steps 3 Through 5
- Review/revisit yesterdays work????????????????10 minutes
- Step 3: Identify best solutions????????????????...30 minutes
- Step 4: Develop evaluation strategy??????????????..15 minutes
- Step 5: consider implementation solutions????????????15 minutes
- Fill out self-assessment form for steps 3-5????????????10 minutes
- Prepare report-out?????????????????????...10 minutes
Recorders should be
prepared to provide a 3-5 minute summary of the group?s deliberations and
decisions during the report-out session.
Step 3: Select Best Solutions
Once you have identified the most critical root causes to address in your improvement effort, the next step is to identify and select the solutions that seem most promising for testing and evaluation. Consult pages 20-23 of the guidebook for assistance with this step.
To focus our work, in the space below write in the single most critical root cause that you believe affects student performance.
NOTE: Since many root causes can combine to affect performance outcomes, in practice you might choose to address a number of root causes simultaneously. To simplify the process, we will focus on only one root cause for this exercise.
3.1 Arraying the Solutions
Based on your own experience and review of the literature, identify between 3 to 5 possible solutions to the root cause you identified.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3.2 Narrowing the Choices
Select the most promising of these potential solutions and answer the following questions about your choice. Review pages 21-22 of the Guidebook for a list of selection criteria.
a. How does your solution address the primary root cause you?ve identified?
b. What evidence do you have that your solution might work?
c. What other types of data might you use (e.g., student satisfaction surveys) to make your decision?
Step 4: Pilot Test and Evaluate
Solutions
Now that you have identified a set of promising solutions on which to base initial improvement efforts, you?ll want to create an evaluation strategy that will allow you to assess how well the improvement strategies and models are working. This section will assist you in selecting practical evaluation designs and analysis tools that you can use to gauge the success of your improvement efforts. Consult pages 24-29 of the guidebook for assistance with this step.
4.1 Choose a Study Design
Listed below are three study
designs you might consider when structuring your evaluation.
Please circle the one that you will implement and remark on why you chose this
design.
· Option A: Random Assignment with
Control Groups?randomly assigning students
into treatment and non-treatment groups to ensure comparability among groups.
· Option B: Comparisons with
Similar Populations?compare student outcomes by taking into account the influences of
other factors on performance.
· Option C: Comparing
Individuals Against Themselves?comparing pre- and
post-tests of student performance or other measures that compare outcomes prior
to, and following participation.
Why did you choose this study design?
4.2 Select Pilot Programs
While
it is tempting to implement your program improvement strategy college wide, it
is advisable to select a subset of programs in which to pilot-test ideas. Which
programs will you pilot the strategy? How will you choose these programs?
4.3 Select Outcome Measures
To
help track performance changes, develop two short-
and long-term measures to provide
some indication of the success of your improvement efforts.
List
two short-term measures that focus on immediate results that must be achieved
to eventually obtain results on the Core Indicators.
1.
2.
List
two long-term measures to provide direct evidence of your success in improving
performance on the Core Indicators.
1.
2.
4.4 Identify Data Sources
After
selecting short- and longer-term outcome measures, you will need to identify
data sources and collection instruments that will allow assessment. Consult the
list on page 27 of the Guidebook and identify some methods of data collection you may wish
to consider.
4.5 Train Pilot Program Staff
Since
the outcomes of your improvement effort will depend upon it being successfully
introduced, you will want to spend some time with pilot program staff reviewing
improvement purposes.
Who
will work with pilot program staff to coordinate improvement efforts?
What
types of supporting materials will need to be developed?
How
will implementation be assessed?
Step 5: Implementing Solutions
Congratulations! If you?ve come this far it is
likely that the solution you selected in Step 1 was successful in increasing
student performance in pilot programs. As you prepare to expand the pool of
participants, it is a good idea to come up with a monitoring process that will
allow you to obtain ongoing feedback on the improvement strategy. This section
will help you to develop implementation plans to monitor outcomes across the
full range of implementation programs.
Consult pages 31-32 of the guidebook for assistance with this step.
5.1 Moving from Pilot Testing to Statewide
Implementation
Replicating small successes on a larger scale can be complicated by the addition of new factors and administrative challenges that can reduce program effectiveness.
Are there any unique characteristics of your pilot programs that will make it difficult for you to expand your efforts to other programs? If so, what are they and how might you plan around them?
What strategy will you use to roll out your efforts across new programs?
5.2 Monitoring Ongoing Implementation
Expanding your improvement efforts requires developing a comprehensive strategy for monitoring the implementation and evaluation approach.
How will you collect information from all programs to ensure that that your intervention efforts are being adopted effectively?
APPLYING
THE PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
A MnSCU CASE STUDY
Work Session Break-Out 2
Steps 3 Through 5
Summarizing Group Findings
STEP 3: SELECT BEST SOLUTIONS
Are your solutions
based on a sound theory of root causes (step 2)? Have the solutions worked under similar or
comparable circumstances? Is the
evidence strong and compelling?
STEP 4: PILOT
TEST AND EVALUATE SOLUTIONS
What study design(s)
did you choose to test your solution(s)?
How did you select your pilot sites, short- and long-term outcome
measures, and identify your data sources?
STEP 5: IMPLEMENT SOLUTIONS
How did you decide to
move from pilot testing to full college implementation? How will you monitor ongoing implementation
and work to sustain your improvement efforts?

