COLLEGE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
Use the worksheet below to assess your college’s improvement process and evaluate actions steps necessary to adopt or adapt the Five-Step Improvement Process to your efforts.
Program Improvement Step
|
Currently Do
|
Partially Do |
Do Not Do |
Action Steps |
Step 1: Document Performance |
|
|
|
|
Document your performance for each indicator |
||||
Determine reasonable performance benchmarks for specific population groups and clusters |
||||
Use graphical tools and statistics to document at least two years of performance for your college and compare data among other colleges and to benchmarks |
||||
Use graphical tools and statistics to document at least two years of performance for each demographic and special population group and compare data among other groups and to benchmarks |
||||
Document your student population mix and compare to benchmarks |
||||
Document at least two years of performance for every CTE program in the state and compare that performance to your programs and benchmarks |
||||
Document your program mix and compare to benchmarks |
||||
Assess the quality of your data and factored in its effect on your performance results |
||||
Determine your performance improvement priorities |
||||
Step 2: Identify Root Causes |
||||
Use multiple approaches to identify potential causes based on data and perspectives of stakeholders |
||||
Group potential causes into causes within your control and those external causes outside your control. |
||||
Use multiple approaches to analyze and evaluate potential causes and assess them according to objective criteria |
||||
Organize your theory of the causes of performance into a visual model or figure that shows: (1) root causes, (2) indirect causes, and (3) external causes outside your control. |
||||
Identify the most critical root causes on which to focus efforts in searching for solutions |
||||
Step 3: Select Best Solutions
|
||||
Identify potential strategies and model by reviewing research and professional literature |
||||
Develop new, integrated, or customized solutions based on an internal design process |
||||
Assess and rate alternative strategies and models based on the five major selection criteria |
||||
Select the best strategies and models for further testing and evaluation |
||||
Step 4: Pilot Test and Evaluate Solutions
|
||||
Pilot test and evaluate improvement strategies that will stand up to scrutiny from outside sources |
||||
Properly identify all strategies and models linked to root causes that contribute to program improvements and eliminate strategies and models in favor of others |
||||
Secure a base of support among pilot-site (program) participants and find ways of enlisting experienced staff in rolling out the improvement strategy |
||||
Identify sufficient resources to ensure that the improvement strategy is correctly implemented in pilot sites (programs) |
||||
Evaluate whether sites (programs) are achieving success and ensure all sites (programs) report on the data elements you’ve identified |
||||
Step 5: Implement Solutions
|
||||
Monitor root causes identified in Step 2 to see if they hold true in new implementation sites (programs) |
||||
Assess how well the improvement strategies you’ve selected address the obstacles to high performance in your college and evaluate whether some are more applicable than others |
||||
Monitor whether implementation sites (programs) and staff properly implement and understand improvement strategies |
||||
Monitor data collection in implementation sites (programs) to accurately capture the progress being made |
||||
Determine mid-term course corrections that you can make to improve performance outcomes |
Program Advisory Committee Handbook Tutorial (CTL Website)
